“I hope Zcash resists the darkish hand of token voting. Token voting is dangerous in some ways; I feel it’s worse than the present state of Zcash. “Privateness is precisely the sort of factor that may erode over time if left to the typical token holder,” Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin wrote Nov. 30 on X.
His message was inserted into an lively debate throughout the Zcash ecosystem, by which his group analyzes structural adjustments in its authorities and financing mannequin.
In line with the imaginative and prescient of the co-founder of Ethereum, delegating governance choices to mechanisms the place every vote will depend on the variety of cash owned may generate incentives that don’t at all times favor the preservation of privateness.
Privateness is the lynchpin of the Zcash protocol and, on the identical time, a rising narrative inside Ethereum, pushed by Vitalik himself.
Proposals beneath debate inside Zcash and a battle, in keeping with Vitalik
The Zcash group is discussing a number of proposals geared toward adjusting how choices are made and the way improvement is funded.
Amongst them stands out ZIP-1016, a Zcash Enchancment Proposal, which seeks redefine block reward distribution scheme.
ZIP-1016 proposes break up a portion of these rewards between two funds: one administered by group subsidies (“Neighborhood Grants”) and one other managed by holders of ZEC (the Zcash foreign money).
Within the latter, 12% of the block rewards can be allotted, which means that those that personal ZEC may straight affect the vacation spot of that capital.
The initiative solely establishes how funding is distributed, however not how choices will likely be made. As a substitute of setting a definitive technique, depart that call for a future stage, the place the group might want to agree on which governance mannequin to make use of.
That time is vital to understanding Vitalik’s warning. If the method finally ends up adopting voting by tokens (a scheme the place whoever has extra cash obtains extra decision-making energy) the door may very well be opened for a small group guides the undertaking priorities.
This hole is the middle of the talk, as a result of the fund managed by the holders may result in a “one token, one vote” system.
In line with Buterin, this mechanism doesn’t match with a undertaking whose central goal is privateness. Of their view, massive holders are likely to give attention to short-term returns, whereas defending privateness requires choices that protect collateral even when they don’t generate speedy advantages.
Zcash was constructed on zero-knowledge proofs (ZK, zero-knowledge proofs), a method that permits transactions to be validated with out revealing delicate information. To maintain that promise over the long run, Buterin argues that governance shouldn’t rely upon particular person financial weight.
The concrete factor is that ZIP-1016 leaves the dialogue open. It is going to be as much as the group to determine whether or not the fund will likely be managed with token voting, delegates, hybrid fashions or one other method. The method is underway and the end result will outline the path of governance in Zcash.
