Evan Cheng, a tech professional, CEO of Mysten Labs, slammed the Ethereum Digital Machine (EVM) as a “essentially damaged” design. Cheng advised the one repair to the EVM’s “design tech debt” can be “taking pictures it within the head and begin over.”
Notably, Evan Cheng beforehand labored at Apple and, then, as Head of Analysis and Improvement at Novi and Technical Director of Meta – displaying a powerful tech curriculum, now accountable for creating the Sui Community (SUI), an Ethereum (ETH) competitor.
In a video, shared by Mysten Labs co-founder Adeniyi Abiodun, the CEO technically explains why the EVM design is damaged. On the similar time, Abiodun supported his colleague, writing that is why they “by no means prioritized EVM compatibility when constructing Sui.”
The EVM, nonetheless, is a well-adopted normal for the crypto business. Notably, different specialists agree with the 2 executives, urging builders to “transfer past dead-end designs.”
Most tech debt could be paid off, however a damaged design is a useless finish.
That is why we by no means prioritized EVM compatibility when constructing Sui.
EVM is a damaged design and it’s time for this business to maneuver past dead-end designs. pic.twitter.com/l8JMcQW33V
— Adeniyi.sui (@EmanAbio) January 8, 2025
Why Ethereum Digital Machine is a damaged design and a tech debt
First, Evan Cheng begins explaining that the “Blockchain Trilemma” jargon has “no mathematical-backing behind it. It’s based mostly on a mistaken design.”
Including to his thought line, the tech professional pointed to few staking swimming pools considerably controlling most of Ethereum’s validating energy. This, in his opinion, “is mistaken” from a decentralization perspective, additionally difficult the so-praised “blockchain trilemma” by EVM supporters.
Cheng continues on this reasoning, explaining that the staking pool instance proves that EVM supporters “science is mistaken” and their “understanding is mistaken” when resorting to the blockchain trilemma to considerably argue that Ethereum is the one (or essentially the most) decentralized layer-one blockchain.
“That is what occurs while you construct the mistaken expertise,” he concludes the primary argument. “There isn’t a path from that.”
Then, the professional explains that, whereas “tech money owed” could be mounted over time, Ethereum has a “design tech debt.” So, “the one method to clear up a whole lot of these issues is taking pictures it within the head and begin over.”
In closing, Cheng mentions all of the “hate” he receives for talking towards Ethereum and Solidity (EVM’s programming language) as one other instance of a “essentially damaged” design.
“The one method to do it, to resolve the issue, is taking pictures it within the head and transfer on from it. However, you have already got so many individuals, firms, customers, all people, relying on it. So, even if you wish to do it, it’s a very tough path.”
– Evan Cheng
Different specialists opinion on the EVM mistaken design
Curiously, Mysten Labs executives and Sui builders will not be the one blockchain and tech specialists highlighting Ethereum design’s elementary flaws.
Kyle Samani, managing associate at Multicoin Capital, posted on January 8 that “Ethereum’s downside is just not advertising and marketing. It’s product. No quantity of promoting can repair a damaged product,” he mentioned.
Robert Sasu, core developer of MultiversX (EGLD), quoted Adeniyi Abiodun publish with Evan Cheng’s video, agreeing with their arguments.
“To begin with, I completely agree that EVM is a mistaken design, because the token requirements on EVM are of a mistaken design. From this you can not construct insanely effectively made dApps and each the customers and builders are all the time at a better threat. EVM was a great begin however folks have to maneuver on. It’s like staying with steam engines when you might have excessive efficiency electrical motors.”
– Robert Sasu
In response to Sasu, the SpaceVM constructed on prime of WASM is a superior different. “WASM is a excessive efficiency electrical motor which can be utilized to run nearly any software program.” Furthermore, the tech professional criticized “single state blockchain networks” as one other damaged design, proposing sharding as a working answer.
Apart from these two, extra builders and specialists from different blockchains like Solana (SOL), Cardano (ADA), Algorand (ALGO), and Close to Protocol (NEAR) have additionally shared comparable opinions all through the years, validating the, now rising opinion, that Ethereum has a “essentially damaged” design, stopping the ecosystem to rise in real-world adoption.
Certainly, Finbold has reported how the EVM’s token design contributes to buyers falling sufferer of phishing assaults and different exploits. Suggesting using blockchains with a “native token” design as a battle-tested answer to forestall the, already so-common, losses from compromised wallets.
Featured picture from Shutterstock
