It is a section from the Lightspeed publication. To learn full editions, subscribe.
Think about for a second that you simply view the world monetary system as one massive centralized hornswoggle that advantages the few on the expense of the various — perish the thought.
Ultimately, you come round to the concept that a fairer system may be attainable by decentralizing authority amongst many unbiased members. As an alternative of a trusted central entity validating transactions, these contributors would run their very own nodes, verifying and sustaining the community by means of distributed consensus.
However right here’s the problem: How do you get 1000’s of decentralized actors — every extremely incentivized to cheat for monetary achieve — to agree on the validity of one another’s work? If even a small group have been to efficiently deceive the community, confidence within the system would collapse.
Satoshi Nakamoto’s answer was proof-of-work (PoW), whereby miners repeatedly hash block knowledge with various nonce values, aiming to discover a answer that meets particular problem standards. The primary to succeed will get to suggest a brand new block and earns a reward paid in bitcoin. Nobody can cheat as a result of each different node shortly verifies or rejects every block earlier than it’s added to the chain.
This technique has labored fairly effectively for BTC, which has had some modest success (lol) in establishing itself as a globally acknowledged, censorship-resistant retailer of worth. Nevertheless, it’s not with out its trade-offs. Bitcoin’s PoW mannequin leads to sluggish transaction speeds and excessive power consumption. The community processes simply seven transactions per second (TPS) on common, far beneath trendy digital fee methods like Visa.
Whereas layer-2 options just like the Lightning Community assist scale Bitcoin’s capability, its base layer stays restricted. Mining additionally consumes power on the dimensions of whole nations, drawing criticism from environmentalists and regulators alike.
As limitations go, although, none of this has been a dealbreaker. However when Ethereum emerged with the objective of programmability by way of sensible contracts, scaling grew to become a a lot larger situation. Executing code onchain is much extra computationally intensive than executing easy transactions, and Ethereum’s base layer (earlier than rollups) manages solely 15-30 TPS, resulting in congestion, excessive charges, and sluggish confirmations throughout peak demand.
Enter Solana’s 2017 breakthrough: proof-of-history (PoH).
PoH isn’t a consensus mechanism — it’s a cryptographic timekeeping system. As an alternative of validators always speaking to find out transaction order, PoH pre-establishes a verifiable sequence of occasions utilizing steady hashing (SHA-256) to create an immutable timeline of transactions.
Pause. I do know this can be a lot. The principle takeaway right here is that PoH theoretically permits Solana to validate 50,000 to 65,000 TPS. That’s much more than Bitcoin and Ethereum, y’all. Transactions settle virtually immediately, making Solana one of many quickest public L1s.
The community combines PoH with proof-of-stake (PoS) to stability pace, safety and decentralization. Not like conventional PoS networks, which require validators to repeatedly agree on timestamps, Solana’s blockchain construction inherently encodes transaction order. That lets validators focus purely on verification and safety, eliminating a significant bottleneck in consensus.
After all, PoH has its personal downsides.
