Regardless of a rising variety of pro-Bitcoin voices within the U.S. Congress, solely a handful of lawmakers presently report proudly owning any type of cryptocurrency.
Out of 535 elected members throughout the Home and Senate, solely 13 have confirmed publicity to digital property. Even fewer, simply 9, have reported proudly owning Bitcoin straight. This stands in distinction to the more and more optimistic rhetoric round crypto coverage coming from each chambers in latest months.
“Who Has Pores and skin within the Sport?” Raises Questions On X
Outstanding Bitcoin advocate and safety engineer Jameson Lopp lately requested on X: “A good variety of U.S. Congress members communicate favorably about Bitcoin. However what number of of them truly consider in it sufficient to personal any?” He pointed readers to https://bitcoinpoliticians.org, a instrument monitoring politicians’ holdings.
A good variety of US Congress members communicate favorably about Bitcoin. However what number of of them truly consider in it sufficient to personal any? You’ll find out who has pores and skin within the sport at https://t.co/66Bg46OTWp
— Jameson Lopp (@lopp) June 9, 2025
As of June 2025, fewer than 3 p.c of Congress members have disclosed crypto holdings, based on the newest public monetary disclosures filed below the STOCK Act.
The “Bitcoin Caucus”: A Small however Influential Group of Holders
Among the many handful of crypto buyers in Congress, a couple of key figures stand out. Senator Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming, a central architect of crypto laws, was an early Bitcoin adopter, 2013 to be actual. Although she beforehand disclosed holdings value over $230,000, Lummis has since positioned her Bitcoin in a blind belief to adjust to ethics guidelines.
Senator Ted Cruz of Texas has additionally voiced sturdy assist for Bitcoin, particularly Bitcoin mining in his house state. His monetary disclosures point out holdings between 15,000 and 50,000 {dollars} in Bitcoin, bought in 2022.
Most notably, Vice President J.D. Vance of Ohio reviews holding between $100,000 and $250,000 in Bitcoin. His place within the government department makes him one of many highest-ranking crypto-holding politicians within the U.S.
Senator Dave McCormick of Pennsylvania holds oblique publicity by means of a Bitwise Bitcoin ETF. Whereas the precise quantity is undisclosed, his funding provides to the listing of lawmakers with ties to crypto markets.
Within the Home of Representatives, Brandon Gill of Texas disclosed as much as 500,000 {dollars} in Bitcoin acquired earlier this yr, though he submitted the report late. Barry Moore of Alabama and Man Reschenthaler of Pennsylvania reported smaller Bitcoin holdings between 1,000 and 15,000 {dollars}.
Mike Collins of Georgia has diversified publicity together with Ethereum, Solana and Cardano, with complete crypto holdings estimated as much as 95,000 {dollars}. On the Democratic facet, Shri Thanedar of Michigan and Jeffrey Jackson of North Carolina had beforehand disclosed crypto exercise, although each have exited most or all positions since 2024.
A Query of Conviction: Extra Politics Than Private Funding?
The small variety of precise buyers, particularly amongst Democrats, the place disclosed holdings are almost non-existent, contrasts sharply with the more and more optimistic public statements about crypto coverage. This hole between phrases and private monetary dedication continues to boost questions concerning the true motivations behind Washington’s latest pro-crypto shift.
Associated: Binance Customers Shed $223 Million in Tether and Bitcoin Holdings to Purchase Extra Ethereum
As Congress prepares to debate a significant crypto-related invoice later this summer time, the state of affairs creates a vital dynamic. The legislative final result will finally reveal whether or not U.S. crypto coverage is formed by the few lawmakers with direct monetary pores and skin within the sport or by the overwhelming majority who maintain no private funding within the expertise.
Disclaimer: The data introduced on this article is for informational and academic functions solely. The article doesn’t represent monetary recommendation or recommendation of any variety. Coin Version isn’t answerable for any losses incurred on account of the utilization of content material, merchandise, or providers talked about. Readers are suggested to train warning earlier than taking any motion associated to the corporate.
